Write an article about the discovery of King Tut’s tomb. Take notes from the sources on the web page.
The article will be assessed on the following:
1.
Focus:
how well your article clearly introduces and communicates your ideas.
2.
Organization:
how well your ideas flow from the opening to the conclusion and how well you
stay on topic throughout the piece.
3.
Elaboration
of Evidence: how well you use sources, facts, and details as evidence.
4.
Language
and Vocabulary: how well you effectively express ideas using precise language
that is appropriate for your audience and purpose, as well as incorporate
grade-level appropriate spelling and grammar.
5.
Presentation:
how your article is presented, including non-fiction text features such as
standout text, headings, titles, visual aids, captions, etc.
FOCUS
|
|
2
|
The response gives sufficient evidence of staying on topic from the
beginning to the end.
|
1
|
The response gives limited evidence of staying on topic from the
beginning to the end.
|
0
|
The response gets no credit as it does not provide evidence of
staying on topic from the beginning to the end.
|
ORGANIZATION
|
|
2
|
The response gives sufficient evidence of ideas that flow from the
opening to the conclusion.
|
1
|
The response gives limited evidence of ideas that flow from the
opening to the conclusion.
|
0
|
The response gets no credit as it does not provide evidence of ideas
that flow from the opening to the conclusion.
|
ELABORATION
OF EVIDENCE
|
|
2
|
The response gives sufficient evidence of using sources, facts, and
supporting details.
|
1
|
The response gives limited evidence of using sources, facts, and
supporting details.
|
0
|
The response gets no credit as it does not provide evidence of using
sources, facts, and supporting details.
|
LANGUAGE
AND VOCABULARY
|
|
2
|
The response gives sufficient evidence of effectively expressing
ideas using precise language that is appropriate for audience and purpose.
|
1
|
The response gives limited evidence of effectively expressing ideas
using precise language that is appropriate for audience and purpose.
|
0
|
The response gives no credit as it does not provide evidence of
effectively expressing ideas using precise language that is appropriate for
audience and purpose.
|
PRESENTATION
|
|
2
|
The response gives sufficient evidence of support of ideas using text
features such as, stand-out text, visuals, captions, headings, title, etc.
|
1
|
The response gives limited evidence of support of ideas using text
features such as, stand-out text, visuals, captions, headings, title, etc.
|
0
|
The response gives no credit as it does not provide support of ideas
using text features such as, stand-out text, visuals, captions, headings,
title, etc.
|